Underwater 3D scanner
Context: underwater imaging
Visual perception in underwater scenarios is hard. In order to understand how and why, let’s have a look at this 360º video recorded by some of my colleagues:
Even though the visibility conditions on this video were almost optimal, we can already identify two main challenges:
- The floating particles in the water blur the image and make it lose the sharpness of its texture, reducing the number of distinctive features.
- The high attenuation rate of water means that light loses most of its power at distances in the order of meters or tens of meters, depending on its wavelength:
A robust solution against these factors is using sonar. Sonars are range sensors that use ultrasonic waves to acquire geometrical information about their surroundings. Ultrasonic waves are mechanical waves and can therefore propagate further and are not affected by water turbidity and varying lighting conditions. However, they typically produce much noisier results and their resolution is in the order of tens of centimeters.
Underwater 3D laser scanners
The low resolution and accuracy of sonars make them unsuitable for many tasks performed by autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), such as manipulation and high-resolution inspection. As an alternative, 3D laser scanners (or lidars) are used instead, which can achieve a typical accuracy in the order of millimeters. If we now revisit the two challenging factors mentioned above, we see that laser scanners:
- can provide dense point clouds even in featureless environments, since they actively project light onto the scene, and
- especially for manipulation tasks, a maximum scanning range of a few meters is not a major problem, since it is longer than the maximum reach of a typical robotic arm.
3D laser scanners typically steer a laser plane using a mirror across a field of view (FoV) of around 40ºx40º. This characteristic makes them particularly useful for manipulation tasks, since they can view a relatively broad FoV without the need of moving the robot. However, the projected laser line is deformed into a curve at the edges of the FoV due to refraction:
Our prototype
Laser scanners seem suitable for manipulation tasks at short ranges. However, the effect of refraction mentioned above may decrease their accuracy or complicate their calibration. At this point, we asked ourselves: is there any way we could project straight lines into the water? Which scanning pattern could achieve that? And how could we realize it? After much thought, we came up with this model:
This is a ray-tracing model able to generate a pattern of optimally-curved points based on the values of different parameters, such as the refraction index of water. In order to be able to steer the laser both vertically and horizontally, we used a 2-axis mirror. The practical realization of the model was published in this paper.
The main conclusions of this work were:
- Our prototype can achieve millimeter accuracy, in the order of other state-of-the-art underwater laser scanners.
- Our approach allows for higher flexibility in the scanning pattern, potentially opening future lines of research.
- Its calibration routine based on simple polynomial fitting is much simpler than other scanners.
- It can currently match state-of-the-art scanning speed (between 50 and 100 scanned lines per second). However, this speed could be noticeably increased by implementing a more efficient controller that dealt better with the highly-resonant dynamic behaviour of the mirror.
Integration into the AUV
Together with Roger Pi, we integrated the scanner into the Girona1000 and calibrated its extrinsic parameters with respect to the robot, enabling dynamic scanning:
Sea experiments
Once the scanner was properly integrated into the AUV, we made a mapping inspection of the rocky seafloor:
An example of the acquired 3D point clouds can be watched in this video:
Acknowledgments
Many big thanks to Lluís Magí for the integration of the electronic components of the scanner, to Roger Pi for the great common work for AUV integration and calibration, and to Pere Ridao, Josep Forest and Albert Palomer for their guidance. Special thanks to Lluís, Roger and Pere for their huge help in the logistics of the sea scanning missions.